In European countries emerging from lockdown, life in quarantine has mostly passed. We have moved to lives in emergence, a daily diary of risk assessment, advisories, and air bridges. Overtourism, at least for now, has returned to mere tourism, spiced by sanitizer, HEPA filters, and masks.
Instagram and Facebook will likely slowly return to bucket list checking on display: a “c’est Moi en Paris” for all to see. Such was pre-pandemic Instagram, documenting our “personal cities” became second nature. From 2015-2017, I offered Seeing the Better City as a deeper dive, beyond show-and-tell declarations, or repetitive illustrations of how the grass is always greener in cities and places where we aren’t now located or never will be. Thanks to coronavirus, its time to revisit those principles, 2020-style.
For some, personal, visual ethnographies were as simple as the ready use of a smartphone and social media sharing of one or more photographs to document daily urban life. Others (c’est Moi encore), did so on regular walks, documenting potholes, land-use application notices, or various stages of new construction. Concerns about urban life also depended on more poignant events faraway, especially those that occur in iconic, international urban places central to the interpretation of city life and urbanism.
For instance, In post-2015 Paris, London, Nice, and many other cities, the emotional reclaiming process after multiple terror events is part of the inevitable urban dynamic and our human capacity to rebuild. Often this dynamic, when on display, shows uniting rather than divisive themes in the urban landscape. During pandemic life in emergence, visiting and photographing cities can emphasize these positive dynamics, and can inspire how rebuilding and healing processes will unfold.
As I have repeatedly noted here since May, qualitative and interactive experiences, along with comparison, seem more important than assembling smart city “data points”. The qualitative and experiential also adds necessary personal dimensions to media representations of cities undergoing change or facing urban-planning challenges. For instance, actually visiting a place you have read or heard about—such as the changing face of East London—provides a firsthand reference for comparison with the impact of similar “gentrification” in many cities around the world.
Another facet of photographing away from home comes from that indescribable human dance of history, people, and place that occurs when, while traveling, we simply like what we see. It is exciting when something resonates and invites a photograph—perhaps a particular urban space, or a building, or a fragment of what was, preserved either purposefully or inadvertently. Sometimes these experiences produce a simple, irrational gestalt: a sudden wish to live in the vacation venue for a year rather than a day . . . or at least to take the places home.
As an example, in Urbanism Without Effort, I wrote about the Cinque Terre in northwest Italy, five towns now preserved as “artifacts” in a designated World Heritage Site, connected by footpath, rail, and water. Their magically photogenic amenities of street, square, and housing are, in reality, far more than facade-based touristic shells, dominated in the summer by strangers rejoicing in local wine and pesto, the absence of cars, and the wonders of a small-scale, interurban trek. As photo-centric urban diary subjects, the towns’ inspirational “we like what we see” elements—walkability, vibrant color, active waterfronts, and seamless interface with terraced landscapes— allow us to import the gift of urban ideas for potential implementation.
However, an overwhelming emotional response to a public place while traveling does not always require an overseas journey to a place like the inspirational footpaths between the Cinque Terre towns. Like many, in 2013, I was highly motivated to photograph the revitalization of downtown Detroit, now proceeding rapidly. On a visit to San Francisco in 2011, during a walk from the Financial District to Telegraph Hill, I encountered a series of urban diary scenes so evocative that they seemed at first staged for the camera. These views emphasized people, bright color, and active settings; in contrast to “worse city” views, they show the “better city,” meaning the positive and dynamic side of urban perception and the full range of emotions away from home.
Amid life in emergence, consider the following (amended from prior, more generic lists) when compiling photo-centric urban documentation, or “urban diary,” while traveling:
Urban Documentation Considerations, Adjusted
- If you are traveling to a place with a venerable urban history, be on the lookout for inspirational examples that, if applied in context, might improve a civic space at home. For instance, the idea for New York’s High Line came first from Paris. How do they look with social distancing implemented (e.g., one-way travel lanes)?
- Beware of nostalgia when observing historical landmarks and places. It is not surprising to be motivated or awestruck; the challenge is to think about why. What is it about seeing such a situation, or otherwise sensing it, that causes any particular reaction? Is the response muted by the need for reservations before visiting, or by masks and hand sanitizer dispensers?
- Use a camera shutter as a reflexive tool. Snap when feelings dictate a sensation; composition need not always be the initial goal.
- Consider annotating why something seems significant in a text or voice note. This focus is vital when traveling, as it may not be easily possible to retrace steps or return to a place that seems significant to verify details about the location or the circumstances of a given photo.
- Guidebooks are helpful, but linear or literal travel is not necessarily the most authentic experience. Recall the role of the dérive and Situationist interpretation. If it’s safe–and now with 1-2 meters in between you and strangers–follow curiosity— sights and smells. On the other hand, be mindful. I once followed graffiti through narrow passages in Jerusalem’s Old City and ended up in a courtyard, surrounded by a group of men. Even though the area was “public,” I was promptly asked to leave.
- If traveling outside your home country, consider how juxtapositions seem different. Private and public space, pavement surfaces, natural and built, transportation modes, eras of construction on infrastructure and buildings, to name but a few, all may overlap in novel ways. It is often worthwhile to ponder why.
- Looking at redevelopment projects reveals good focal points, as these projects tend to be indicative of change, yet can seamlessly blend with existing conditions. Reinvented urban space need not be controversial for failure to honor existing fabric and context. Track responses carefully. In Nice, France, I am always aware of the blended interplay among pedestrians, buses, automobiles, and trams downtown in the post-tramway era, without the need for signage or traffic direction. This blend has not changed and is exacerbated by signage emphasizing social distancing.
- Follow basic human needs as starting urban diary themes. They will define what you see along the way. They may be as simple as the characteristics of where people live, or where the less fortunate find a place to sleep, or the locations available for a trip to a store, restaurant, or café. Depending on distance, and current constraints on the number of passengers within subways, trains, and buses, these factors will likely influence the chosen mode of transportation, and the way crossings occur with other people’s paths.
- Center on people and, as already noted, attempt to include them in photographs, even from afar. How we see people interacting with the physical environment, in combination with other factors, will influence what we take away from exploration and observation.
- Consider how light guides perception. Depending on climate and color, an urban diary may assume a different mood.
- Emphasize the role of the scale of the built environment and its appeal for street life. Many have written about the way that areas with different commercial street life and windows open to view (or other forms of soft edges) will create a different response than blank walls or other types of limited accessibility. With alfresco dining and other increasingly popular mitigation measures, such street life considerations remain universal in a post-pandemic world.
Adapted from Wolfe, C.R., Seeing the Better City, (Island Press, 2017).